2026 GENERAL ELECTION / BRAZOS COUNTY OCT 28 FILE SNAPSHOT
BRAZOS COUNTY TURNOUT

Turnout, at a glance.

Explore the supplied snapshot, its modeled composition, and what the geography can resolve.

File dated October 28, 2026Cleaned file · Reporting cutoff not supplied
Supplied-file information

Loading snapshot…

Geographic views overlap. Their totals must not be added together. Every chart and export follows the filters above.

Voting method

In-person and mail counts from the cleaned file · Unknown preserves missing or ambiguous information

01

Modeled party disposition

Original thresholds retained · Swing split at 0.5000

Classification from supplied affinity scores. Exact disposition boundaries and missing scores remain unclassified.
02

Conservative / liberal affinity

Includes swing records · Denominator includes missing scores

03

Affinity by gender

Follows geographic view, record universe, and election precinct

Conservative Liberal Neutral / no score

F and M follow the supplied codes. O is shown as “Source code O” because its meaning was not documented.

04

What this view covers

Source assignments and verification are reported separately

i
Geographic assignment

i
EV / ballot by mail

—
Daily trend & turnout rate

Voting dates, a reporting cutoff, and a complete registration denominator were not supplied. Counts are available; a county turnout rate is not.

—
County record verification

No county voter roster was attached. County-verified voter matches and ballot types: 0.

ACTUAL ELECTION PRECINCT BOUNDARIES

Explore the precincts

Select a precinct for aggregate details in the current view. Drag to pan; use + / − to zoom.

Conservative exceeds liberal Liberal exceeds conservative Equal counts Missing / unresolved
N
↑
Brazos County election precinct map
Click or tap a precinct · Arrow keys pan · + / − zoom

Color compares conservative (score > 0.5000) with liberal (score < 0.5000) records in the selected universe. Gray means equal known counts. Hatching means missing records or unresolved assignments. No supplied records does not establish zero turnout.

Loading official precinct boundaries…

Geographic coverage and unresolved precincts

Official boundary sources and their dates are listed below. Map matching uses supplied precinct labels; it does not independently verify a voter’s registered precinct.

SELECTED VIEW, PRECINCT BY PRECINCT

Precinct breakdown

Aggregate supplied records, EV / mail flags, and modeled disposition. Select a column heading to sort.

R − D: (Hard R + Soft R) − (Hard D + Soft D). Swing and unclassified excluded.Zero affirmative flags does not establish zero actual turnout.
DATA COVERAGE

Data & methodology

Definitions, assignment rules, source dates, and remaining gaps.

Geographic view coverage

County, House, and commissioner views use supplied turnout-file fields. College Station, Bryan, and Bryan SMDs 1–5 use exact precinct assignments from the supplied district chart dated August 31, 2026. A city name in a mailing address does not add a record to a city view. Unlisted source codes and chart codes with no matching records are disclosed separately. County voter-record verification remains pending.

ViewStatusIncluded recordsUnresolved / excludedAssignment basis / needed information

Source & record handling

The cleaned Brazos turnout CSV is dated October 28, 2026 in its filename. In Person Ballot provides the early-voting flag; Mail Ballot provides the mail flag. County Commissioner provides an explicit supplied jurisdiction assignment. No ballot event dates, verified reporting cutoff, or independent county roster was supplied.

County view: records labeled Brazos in the supplied County field. House District 14: that county subset with supplied Official State House District equal to 014. Commissioner views: that county subset with the corresponding County Commissioner label. These assignments have not been reconciled to a county roster. Other-county or missing-county rows remain excluded pending reconciliation.

Record universe: “All supplied records” includes unknown voting methods. Their turnout is not independently established. “EV / BBM flagged records” includes rows with exactly one affirmative EV or BBM flag. It does not add county-only voters.

Voting method: In Person Ballot maps to early voting (EV). Mail Ballot maps to mail (BBM). Missing or conflicting flags remain Unknown. All current assignments rely on the supplied file. A future unique exact voter-ID county match takes precedence; IDs are compared as trimmed strings with leading zeros preserved.

Modeled disposition thresholds

Hard Republican
Score > 0.749
Soft Republican
0.56 < score < 0.749
Swing Right
0.5000 < score < 0.56
Swing Left
0.44 < score < 0.5000
Swing Neutral
Score = 0.5000
Soft Democrat
0.249 < score < 0.44
Hard Democrat
Score < 0.249

Conservative includes every valid score above 0.5000. Liberal includes every valid score below 0.5000. These counts include disposition-boundary scores, even when the disposition chart leaves those scores unclassified.

Geography & percentages

Election precincts and commissioner precincts are different units. Commissioner membership follows the explicit supplied commissioner field. College Station uses X in the district chart’s CS CITY column. Bryan uses populated BRYAN SMD entries, with separate views for each district. Blank city entries exclude that chart precinct from the city even when its mailing address names the city.

Numeric precinct codes are matched after zero-padding; split codes such as 2-CS and 3-B remain distinct. A numbered precinct is never silently matched to a suffixed row. The literal city columns control membership, including where a suffix name might suggest something else. Chart codes with no supplied records have unknown turnout. Supplied codes absent from the chart remain unresolved and are excluded from city and SMD totals.

City maps show full matched election precinct shapes with the city outline as a reference. Bryan SMD maps show the election precincts assigned by the chart; no separate official SMD outline is claimed. Split precincts without their own usable geometry remain disclosed. Polygon overlap does not determine city membership.

House and commissioner maps retain their clipped jurisdiction portions and supplied assignment counts. Supplied commissioner assignments stay in the charts even when the map disagrees. Zero-intersection conflicts, missing polygons, and overlaps below 1 m² are disclosed separately and are not counted as reliable map placement. No record is moved to another jurisdiction to fit the map.

Percentages use every record in the selected view, universe, and precinct, including missing affinity. Gender percentages use the selected gender’s record count. The affinity gap is (conservative − liberal) ÷ selected records, expressed in percentage points. The five SMD subtotals reconcile to Bryan; do not add those subtotals again to the city total. County, city, House, and commissioner views overlap.

Aggregate data only

The dashboard, deployed source, and downloads contain aggregate counts and public boundary geometry only. Names, voter IDs, phone numbers, addresses, birth dates, and individual affinity scores are excluded.

Modeled affinity describes the supplied records. It is not declared party affiliation or a record of how anyone voted.

To improve coverage: county turnout records need exact IDs, registered election precinct, ballot method, and cutoff. Jurisdiction gaps can use an authoritative precinct/subprecinct or ballot-style crosswalk, authoritative jurisdiction fields, or verified residential locations. A separate voter-ID jurisdiction file is not required when another verified mapping resolves membership.

District chart & official boundary sources

Official GIS availability is documented separately from effective-date confirmation. Local boundary currency at the snapshot date must be checked against county and city election records.